Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Slovak Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
578,214 Hectares
in 2020
Slovak Republic
4,903 Hectares
in 2020
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) rank
11th
Slovak Republic rank
22nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
  • Slovak Republic
0200.0k400.0k600.0k200020102020

How they compare

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) currently reports 578,214 Hectares against 4,903 Hectares in Slovak Republic, a difference of 573,311 Hectares.

That makes Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)'s figure about 117.9 times Slovak Republic's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) has been ahead every year.

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 11th and Slovak Republic ranks 22nd of 28 groups.

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) Slovak Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 578,214 Hectares 4,903 Hectares 573,311 Hectares Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
2010s 578,214 Hectares 4,903 Hectares 573,311 Hectares Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
2020s 578,214 Hectares 4,903 Hectares 573,311 Hectares Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) or Slovak Republic?
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA), at 578,214 Hectares against 4,903 Hectares in Slovak Republic as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Slovak Republic?
573,311 Hectares, with Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Slovak Republic?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Slovak Republic rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 11th and Slovak Republic ranks 22nd of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Slovak Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/arab-maghreb-union-uma/slovak-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/arab-maghreb-union-uma/slovak-republic-2/">Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Slovak Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.