Africa, fragile states vs Russian Federation: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Africa, fragile states
1.47 million Hectares
in 2020
Russian Federation
1.71 million Hectares
in 2020
Africa, fragile states rank
16th
Russian Federation rank
2nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Africa, fragile states
  • Russian Federation
0500.0k1.0M1.5M200020102020

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 1.71 million Hectares against 1.47 million Hectares in Africa, fragile states, a difference of 240,140 Hectares.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Africa, fragile states's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Africa, fragile states ranks 16th and Russian Federation ranks 2nd of 47 regions.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa, fragile states Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 1.47 million Hectares 1.71 million Hectares 241,440 Hectares Russian Federation
2010s 1.47 million Hectares 1.71 million Hectares 240,142 Hectares Russian Federation
2020s 1.47 million Hectares 1.71 million Hectares 240,140 Hectares Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Africa, fragile states or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 1.71 million Hectares against 1.47 million Hectares in Africa, fragile states as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Africa, fragile states and Russian Federation?
240,140 Hectares, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa, fragile states and Russian Federation?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Africa, fragile states and Russian Federation rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Africa, fragile states ranks 16th and Russian Federation ranks 2nd of 47 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa, fragile states vs Russian Federation: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/africa-fragile-states/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-country-area/africa-fragile-states/russian-federation/">Africa, fragile states vs Russian Federation: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Country area
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.