Denmark vs Marshall Islands: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of

Denmark
45 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
Marshall Islands
44.95 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
Denmark rank
44th
Marshall Islands rank
45th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of over time

  • Denmark
  • Marshall Islands
0204060200020112022

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 45 Percentage of GDP against 44.95 Percentage of GDP in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.05 Percentage of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

Denmark ranks 44th and Marshall Islands ranks 45th of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Marshall Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 47.87 Percentage of GDP 52.3 Percentage of GDP 4.43 Percentage of GDP Marshall Islands
2010s 50.62 Percentage of GDP 47.07 Percentage of GDP 3.56 Percentage of GDP Denmark
2020s 47.94 Percentage of GDP 44.07 Percentage of GDP 3.87 Percentage of GDP Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, Denmark or Marshall Islands?
Denmark, at 45 Percentage of GDP against 44.95 Percentage of GDP in Marshall Islands as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between Denmark and Marshall Islands?
0.05 Percentage of GDP, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Marshall Islands?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Denmark and Marshall Islands rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
Denmark ranks 44th and Marshall Islands ranks 45th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in other activities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Marshall Islands: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added-5/denmark/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added-5/denmark/marshall-islands/">Denmark vs Marshall Islands: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in other activities
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,627 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.