Kyrgyzstan vs North Macedonia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of

Kyrgyzstan
18.85 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
North Macedonia
19.06 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
98th
North Macedonia rank
97th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • North Macedonia
0102030200020112022

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 19.06 Percentage of GDP against 18.85 Percentage of GDP in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.21 Percentage of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 98th and North Macedonia ranks 97th of 170 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 19.74 Percentage of GDP 17.17 Percentage of GDP 2.57 Percentage of GDP Kyrgyzstan
2010s 20.49 Percentage of GDP 19.2 Percentage of GDP 1.29 Percentage of GDP Kyrgyzstan
2020s 19.87 Percentage of GDP 19.54 Percentage of GDP 0.3243 Percentage of GDP Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, Kyrgyzstan or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 19.06 Percentage of GDP against 18.85 Percentage of GDP in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia?
0.21 Percentage of GDP, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Kyrgyzstan and North Macedonia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 98th and North Macedonia ranks 97th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in mining, manufacturing, utilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs North Macedonia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added-4/kyrgyz-republic/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added-4/kyrgyz-republic/north-macedonia/">Kyrgyzstan vs North Macedonia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in mining, manufacturing, utilities
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,627 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.