Fragile states vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of

Fragile states
24.69 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
Zimbabwe
39.71 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
Fragile states rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
18th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of over time

  • Fragile states
  • Zimbabwe
1020304050200020112022

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 39.71 Percentage of GDP against 24.69 Percentage of GDP in Fragile states, a difference of 15.02 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Fragile states's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Fragile states ahead.

Fragile states ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 47 regions.

Across the 3 decades both report, Fragile states averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fragile states Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 30.26 Percentage of GDP 24.62 Percentage of GDP 5.63 Percentage of GDP Fragile states
2010s 27.1 Percentage of GDP 25.69 Percentage of GDP 1.41 Percentage of GDP Fragile states
2020s 24.12 Percentage of GDP 33.06 Percentage of GDP 8.95 Percentage of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, Fragile states or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 39.71 Percentage of GDP against 24.69 Percentage of GDP in Fragile states as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between Fragile states and Zimbabwe?
15.02 Percentage of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fragile states and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Fragile states and Zimbabwe rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
Fragile states ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 18th of 47 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in mining, manufacturing, utilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fragile states vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added-4/fragile-states/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added-4/fragile-states/zimbabwe/">Fragile states vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in mining, manufacturing, utilities
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,627 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.