Burkina Faso vs Latvia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of

Burkina Faso
29.58 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
Latvia
19.46 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
Burkina Faso rank
39th
Latvia rank
41st

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Latvia
0102030200020112022

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 29.58 Percentage of GDP against 19.46 Percentage of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 10.12 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.5 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 39th and Latvia ranks 41st of 170 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 19.13 Percentage of GDP 16.67 Percentage of GDP 2.46 Percentage of GDP Burkina Faso
2010s 23.87 Percentage of GDP 16.28 Percentage of GDP 7.59 Percentage of GDP Burkina Faso
2020s 30.64 Percentage of GDP 17.84 Percentage of GDP 12.79 Percentage of GDP Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, Burkina Faso or Latvia?
Burkina Faso, at 29.58 Percentage of GDP against 19.46 Percentage of GDP in Latvia as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between Burkina Faso and Latvia?
10.12 Percentage of GDP, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Latvia?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Burkina Faso and Latvia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
Burkina Faso ranks 39th and Latvia ranks 41st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in mining, manufacturing, utilities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Latvia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added-4/burkina-faso/latvia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added-4/burkina-faso/latvia-2/">Burkina Faso vs Latvia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in mining, manufacturing, utilities
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,627 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.