Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of

Belarus
1.86 Percentage of GDP
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe
1.88 Percentage of GDP
in 2021
Belarus rank
89th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
88th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of over time

  • Belarus
  • Sao Tome and Principe
1234200020102021

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.88 Percentage of GDP against 1.86 Percentage of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0.02 Percentage of GDP.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 89th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 169 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 1.7 Percentage of GDP 3.26 Percentage of GDP 1.56 Percentage of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1.5 Percentage of GDP 3.22 Percentage of GDP 1.72 Percentage of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 1.69 Percentage of GDP 1.93 Percentage of GDP 0.2403 Percentage of GDP Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, Belarus or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.88 Percentage of GDP against 1.86 Percentage of GDP in Belarus as of 2021.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.02 Percentage of GDP, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
Belarus ranks 89th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 88th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Total natural resources rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-total/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-total/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/">Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Total natural resources rents
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,270 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.