Côte d’Ivoire vs Myanmar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of

Côte d’Ivoire
2.5 Percentage of GDP
in 2021
Myanmar
2 Percentage of GDP
in 2021
Côte d’Ivoire rank
32nd
Myanmar rank
35th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of over time

  • Côte d’Ivoire
  • Myanmar
0123200020102021

How they compare

Côte d’Ivoire currently reports 2.5 Percentage of GDP against 2 Percentage of GDP in Myanmar, a difference of 0.5 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Côte d’Ivoire's figure about 1.3 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Myanmar ahead.

Côte d’Ivoire ranks 32nd and Myanmar ranks 35th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Côte d’Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d’Ivoire Myanmar Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0372 Percentage of GDP 0.3216 Percentage of GDP 0.2844 Percentage of GDP Myanmar
2010s 0.4351 Percentage of GDP 0.6287 Percentage of GDP 0.1936 Percentage of GDP Myanmar
2020s 1.61 Percentage of GDP 1.26 Percentage of GDP 0.3555 Percentage of GDP Côte d’Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, Côte d’Ivoire or Myanmar?
Côte d’Ivoire, at 2.5 Percentage of GDP against 2 Percentage of GDP in Myanmar as of 2021.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between Côte d’Ivoire and Myanmar?
0.5 Percentage of GDP, with Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d’Ivoire and Myanmar?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Côte d’Ivoire and Myanmar rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
Côte d’Ivoire ranks 32nd and Myanmar ranks 35th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Mineral rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d’Ivoire vs Myanmar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-mineral/cote-d-ivoire-2/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-mineral/cote-d-ivoire-2/myanmar/">Côte d’Ivoire vs Myanmar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Mineral rents
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,288 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.