New Zealand vs Slovenia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of

New Zealand
0.0307 Percentage of GDP
in 2021
Slovenia
0.0259 Percentage of GDP
in 2021
New Zealand rank
34th
Slovenia rank
31st

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of over time

  • New Zealand
  • Slovenia
00.10.20.3200020102021

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0307 Percentage of GDP against 0.0259 Percentage of GDP in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0048 Percentage of GDP.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 34th and Slovenia ranks 31st of 160 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1036 Percentage of GDP 0.0833 Percentage of GDP 0.0203 Percentage of GDP New Zealand
2010s 0.0823 Percentage of GDP 0.0647 Percentage of GDP 0.0176 Percentage of GDP New Zealand
2020s 0.0251 Percentage of GDP 0.0218 Percentage of GDP 0.0033 Percentage of GDP New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, New Zealand or Slovenia?
New Zealand, at 0.0307 Percentage of GDP against 0.0259 Percentage of GDP in Slovenia as of 2021.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between New Zealand and Slovenia?
0.0048 Percentage of GDP, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovenia?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do New Zealand and Slovenia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
New Zealand ranks 34th and Slovenia ranks 31st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Coal rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Slovenia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-coal-rents/new-zealand/slovenia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-coal-rents/new-zealand/slovenia-2/">New Zealand vs Slovenia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Coal rents
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
234 places, 5,062 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.