Lithuania vs Panama: Adjusted net savings per capita
Lithuania
2,775 current US$
in 2021
Panama
2,659 current US$
in 2021
Lithuania rank
27th
Panama rank
28th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Panama
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 2,775 current US$ against 2,659 current US$ in Panama, a difference of 116 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Panama ahead.
Lithuania ranks 27th and Panama ranks 28th of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -57.26 current US$ | 688.13 current US$ | 745.39 current US$ | Panama |
| 2000s | 488.77 current US$ | 907.11 current US$ | 418.34 current US$ | Panama |
| 2010s | 1,556 current US$ | 3,142 current US$ | 1,586 current US$ | Panama |
| 2020s | 2,517 current US$ | 2,458 current US$ | 59.12 current US$ | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Lithuania or Panama?
- Lithuania, at 2,775 current US$ against 2,659 current US$ in Panama as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Lithuania and Panama?
- 116 current US$, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Panama?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Lithuania and Panama rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 27th and Panama ranks 28th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Adjusted net savings per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide.