Lesotho vs Niger: Adjusted net savings per capita
Lesotho
82.71 current US$
in 2020
Niger
67.89 current US$
in 2020
Lesotho rank
115th
Niger rank
118th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Lesotho
- Niger
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 82.71 current US$ against 67.89 current US$ in Niger, a difference of 14.82 current US$.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 115th and Niger ranks 118th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Niger in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 367.85 current US$ | 89.8 current US$ | 278.05 current US$ | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 109.14 current US$ | 122.92 current US$ | 13.79 current US$ | Niger |
| 2020s | 82.71 current US$ | 67.89 current US$ | 14.82 current US$ | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Lesotho or Niger?
- Lesotho, at 82.71 current US$ against 67.89 current US$ in Niger as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Lesotho and Niger?
- 14.82 current US$, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Niger?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Lesotho and Niger rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Lesotho ranks 115th and Niger ranks 118th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Adjusted net savings per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide.