Kazakhstan vs Rwanda: Adjusted net savings per capita
Kazakhstan
-1.19 current US$
in 2021
Rwanda
4.38 current US$
in 2021
Kazakhstan rank
131st
Rwanda rank
130th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 4.38 current US$ against -1.19 current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 5.57 current US$.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 3.7 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 131st and Rwanda ranks 130th of 164 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 795.79 current US$ | -7.24 current US$ | 803.03 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 324.13 current US$ | -5.59 current US$ | 329.72 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Kazakhstan or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 4.38 current US$ against -1.19 current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
- 5.57 current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Rwanda rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 131st and Rwanda ranks 130th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Adjusted net savings per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide.