Eswatini vs Senegal: Adjusted net savings per capita
Eswatini
208.22 current US$
in 2021
Senegal
234.8 current US$
in 2018
Eswatini rank
100th
Senegal rank
99th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 234.8 current US$ against 208.22 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 26.58 current US$.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 100th and Senegal ranks 99th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 81.12 current US$ | 14.95 current US$ | 66.17 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 244.55 current US$ | 64.75 current US$ | 179.79 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 23.66 current US$ | 151.97 current US$ | 128.31 current US$ | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Eswatini or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 234.8 current US$ against 208.22 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Eswatini and Senegal?
- 26.58 current US$, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Senegal?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Eswatini and Senegal rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 100th and Senegal ranks 99th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Adjusted net savings per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide.