Colombia vs Ghana: Adjusted net savings per capita
Colombia
106.51 current US$
in 2021
Ghana
103.53 current US$
in 2021
Colombia rank
112th
Ghana rank
113th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Colombia
- Ghana
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 106.51 current US$ against 103.53 current US$ in Ghana, a difference of 2.98 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 112th and Ghana ranks 113th of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 111.61 current US$ | -12.36 current US$ | 123.97 current US$ | Colombia |
| 2000s | 139 current US$ | -10.09 current US$ | 149.09 current US$ | Colombia |
| 2010s | 305.06 current US$ | 31.38 current US$ | 273.68 current US$ | Colombia |
| 2020s | 185.5 current US$ | 213.49 current US$ | 27.99 current US$ | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Colombia or Ghana?
- Colombia, at 106.51 current US$ against 103.53 current US$ in Ghana as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Colombia and Ghana?
- 2.98 current US$, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Ghana?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Colombia and Ghana rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Colombia ranks 112th and Ghana ranks 113th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Adjusted net savings per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide.