China vs Uruguay: Adjusted net savings per capita
China
2,091 current US$
in 2021
Uruguay
2,238 current US$
in 2021
China rank
35th
Uruguay rank
32nd
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- China
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 2,238 current US$ against 2,091 current US$ in China, a difference of 147 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times China's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
China ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 164 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 118.82 current US$ | 823.43 current US$ | 704.61 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 493.5 current US$ | 938.86 current US$ | 445.36 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 1,519 current US$ | 2,238 current US$ | 718.55 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 1,861 current US$ | 2,166 current US$ | 305.03 current US$ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, China or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 2,238 current US$ against 2,091 current US$ in China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between China and Uruguay?
- 147 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do China and Uruguay rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- China ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Adjusted net savings per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide.