China vs Poland: Adjusted net savings per capita
China
2,091 current US$
in 2021
Poland
1,925 current US$
in 2021
China rank
35th
Poland rank
38th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- China
- Poland
How they compare
China currently reports 2,091 current US$ against 1,925 current US$ in Poland, a difference of 166 current US$.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Poland ahead.
China ranks 35th and Poland ranks 38th of 164 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 159.74 current US$ | 333.72 current US$ | 173.99 current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 493.5 current US$ | 485.07 current US$ | 8.43 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 1,519 current US$ | 1,161 current US$ | 358.29 current US$ | China |
| 2020s | 1,861 current US$ | 1,826 current US$ | 35.28 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, China or Poland?
- China, at 2,091 current US$ against 1,925 current US$ in Poland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between China and Poland?
- 166 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Poland?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do China and Poland rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- China ranks 35th and Poland ranks 38th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Adjusted net savings per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide.