Bhutan vs Guatemala: Adjusted net savings per capita
Bhutan
427.18 current US$
in 2021
Guatemala
439.77 current US$
in 2021
Bhutan rank
79th
Guatemala rank
78th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 439.77 current US$ against 427.18 current US$ in Bhutan, a difference of 12.59 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 79th and Guatemala ranks 78th of 164 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 433.28 current US$ | 77.27 current US$ | 356 current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 642.84 current US$ | 117.07 current US$ | 525.77 current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 480.21 current US$ | 410.69 current US$ | 69.52 current US$ | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Bhutan or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 439.77 current US$ against 427.18 current US$ in Bhutan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Bhutan and Guatemala?
- 12.59 current US$, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Guatemala?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Bhutan and Guatemala rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 79th and Guatemala ranks 78th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Adjusted net savings per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide.