Belgium vs South Korea: Adjusted net savings per capita
Belgium
6,276 current US$
in 2021
South Korea
6,319 current US$
in 2021
Belgium rank
15th
South Korea rank
14th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Belgium
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 6,319 current US$ against 6,276 current US$ in Belgium, a difference of 43 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 15th and South Korea ranks 14th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,404 current US$ | 3,443 current US$ | 1,961 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2010s | 5,001 current US$ | 5,537 current US$ | 536.07 current US$ | South Korea |
| 2020s | 5,547 current US$ | 6,005 current US$ | 457.57 current US$ | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Belgium or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 6,319 current US$ against 6,276 current US$ in Belgium as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Belgium and South Korea?
- 43 current US$, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South Korea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Belgium and South Korea rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Belgium ranks 15th and South Korea ranks 14th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Adjusted net savings per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide.