Bahrain vs Japan: Adjusted net savings per capita
Bahrain
1,602 current US$
in 2018
Japan
1,480 current US$
in 2021
Bahrain rank
41st
Japan rank
44th
Adjusted net savings per capita over time
- Bahrain
- Japan
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 1,602 current US$ against 1,480 current US$ in Japan, a difference of 122 current US$.
That makes Bahrain's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Japan ahead.
Bahrain ranks 41st and Japan ranks 44th of 164 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1,444 current US$ | 4,487 current US$ | 5,931 current US$ | Japan |
| 2000s | 1,051 current US$ | 2,873 current US$ | 1,822 current US$ | Japan |
| 2010s | 1,250 current US$ | 2,065 current US$ | 814.91 current US$ | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted net savings per capita, Bahrain or Japan?
- Bahrain, at 1,602 current US$ against 1,480 current US$ in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in adjusted net savings per capita between Bahrain and Japan?
- 122 current US$, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Japan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Bahrain and Japan rank globally for adjusted net savings per capita?
- Bahrain ranks 41st and Japan ranks 44th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Adjusted net savings per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted net savings are equal to net national savings plus education expenditure and minus energy depletion, mineral depletion, net forest depletion, and carbon dioxide.