Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Kyrgyzstan
47.4%
in 2020
South Africa
50.2%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
South Africa rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 50.2% against 47.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 10th of 34 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 50.1% | 57.7% | 7.6% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 47.4% | 59.3% | 11.8% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 50.2% against 47.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 2.8%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th and South Africa ranks 10th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group