Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Kazakhstan
57.9%
in 2021
Serbia
64.3%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
6th
Serbia rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 64.3% against 57.9% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 6.4%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 4th of 34 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.5% | 53.1% | 41.6% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 49.2% | 66.1% | 16.9% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 57.9% | 64.7% | 6.7% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 64.3% against 57.9% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Kazakhstan ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 4th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group