Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Costa Rica
40.3%
in 2022
Mongolia
47.8%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
15th
Mongolia rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 47.8% against 40.3% in Costa Rica, a difference of 7.5%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 34 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 33.4% | 34.5% | 1.1% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 43.2% | 47.8% | 4.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 47.8% against 40.3% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Costa Rica ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group