Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Costa Rica
40.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
47.4%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
15th
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 47.4% against 40.3% in Costa Rica, a difference of 7.1%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.4% | 47.2% | 12.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 43.2% | 47.4% | 4.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 47.4% against 40.3% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7.1%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Costa Rica ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group