Chile vs Panama: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Chile
29.4%
in 2022
Panama
31.1%
in 2023
Chile rank
28th
Panama rank
25th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 31.1% against 29.4% in Chile, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 28th and Panama ranks 25th of 34 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.3% | 36.5% | 11.2% | Panama |
| 2010s | 26.7% | 32.2% | 5.4% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Chile or Panama?
- Panama, at 31.1% against 29.4% in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Chile and Panama?
- 1.7%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Chile ranks 28th and Panama ranks 25th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group