Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Brazil
41.8%
in 2022
Mongolia
47.8%
in 2020
Brazil rank
14th
Mongolia rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 47.8% against 41.8% in Brazil, a difference of 6.0%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.7% | 31.3% | 16.3% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 44.8% | 36.4% | 8.4% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 43.1% | 47.8% | 4.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 47.8% against 41.8% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Brazil ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group