Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Brazil
41.8%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
47.4%
in 2020
Brazil rank
14th
Kyrgyzstan rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 47.4% against 41.8% in Brazil, a difference of 5.6%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.9% | 33.8% | 13.0% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 44.7% | 46.4% | 1.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 43.1% | 47.4% | 4.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 47.4% against 41.8% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Brazil ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 13th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group