Armenia vs Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Armenia
40.1%
in 2022
Costa Rica
40.3%
in 2022
Armenia rank
16th
Costa Rica rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Armenia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 40.3% against 40.1% in Armenia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Armenia ranks 16th and Costa Rica ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.7% | 42.0% | 14.3% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 35.3% | 34.4% | 0.9% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 44.4% | 40.9% | 3.5% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Armenia or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 40.3% against 40.1% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 0.2%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Costa Rica rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Armenia ranks 16th and Costa Rica ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group