Armenia vs Brazil: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Armenia
40.1%
in 2022
Brazil
41.8%
in 2022
Armenia rank
16th
Brazil rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Armenia
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 41.8% against 40.1% in Armenia, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Armenia ranks 16th and Brazil ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.6% | 47.7% | 14.0% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 36.0% | 44.7% | 8.7% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 44.4% | 42.7% | 1.6% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Armenia or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 41.8% against 40.1% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Armenia and Brazil?
- 1.7%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brazil?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Brazil rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Armenia ranks 16th and Brazil ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group