Argentina vs Brazil: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Argentina
39.9%
in 2022
Brazil
41.8%
in 2022
Argentina rank
17th
Brazil rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban over time
- Argentina
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 41.8% against 39.9% in Argentina, a difference of 1.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Argentina ranks 17th and Brazil ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.2% | 46.9% | 4.7% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 40.6% | 44.1% | 3.5% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 42.4% | 42.7% | 0.3% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban, Argentina or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 41.8% against 39.9% in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban between Argentina and Brazil?
- 1.9%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Brazil?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Brazil rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
- Argentina ranks 17th and Brazil ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group