Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Mongolia
51.9%
in 2020
Uruguay
53.5%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
6th
Uruguay rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 53.5% against 51.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 5th of 30 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.4% | 33.2% | 2.2% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 36.8% | 39.6% | 2.7% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 51.9% | 56.1% | 4.2% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 53.5% against 51.9% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 1.6%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 5th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group