Mongolia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Mongolia
51.9%
in 2020
Poland
71.8%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
6th
Poland rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 71.8% against 51.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 19.9%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.4 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 6th and Poland ranks 4th of 30 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.4% | 60.9% | 27.5% | Poland |
| 2010s | 34.5% | 62.7% | 28.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 71.8% against 51.9% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Mongolia and Poland?
- 19.9%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 6th and Poland ranks 4th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group