Kazakhstan vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Kazakhstan
49.2%
in 2021
South Africa
51.8%
in 2021
Kazakhstan rank
10th
South Africa rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Kazakhstan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 51.8% against 49.2% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 7th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.7% | 56.6% | 21.9% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 51.0% | 50.9% | 0.0% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Kazakhstan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 51.8% against 49.2% in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Kazakhstan and South Africa?
- 2.6%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Kazakhstan ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 7th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group