Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Kazakhstan
49.2%
in 2021
Serbia
49.1%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
10th
Serbia rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 49.2% against 49.1% in Serbia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Serbia ranks 12th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.7% | 40.8% | 32.1% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 40.4% | 48.1% | 7.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 49.2% | 48.0% | 1.3% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 49.2% against 49.1% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0.1%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Serbia ranks 12th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group