Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Costa Rica
43.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
40.7%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
16th
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 43.3% against 40.7% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.5% | 43.2% | 4.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 47.4% | 40.7% | 6.7% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Costa Rica, at 43.3% against 40.7% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.6%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Costa Rica ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group