Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Chile
37.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
40.7%
in 2020
Chile rank
20th
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 40.7% against 37.9% in Chile, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 20th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.2% | 26.6% | 1.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 25.8% | 43.9% | 18.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 28.1% | 40.7% | 12.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 40.7% against 37.9% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.8%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Chile ranks 20th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group