Brazil vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Brazil
51.3%
in 2022
South Africa
51.8%
in 2021
Brazil rank
8th
South Africa rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Brazil
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 51.8% against 51.3% in Brazil, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 7th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 55.0% | 56.1% | 1.1% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 53.5% | 50.9% | 2.6% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Brazil or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 51.8% against 51.3% in Brazil as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Brazil and South Africa?
- 0.5%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Brazil ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 7th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group