Brazil vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Brazil
51.3%
in 2022
Mongolia
51.9%
in 2020
Brazil rank
8th
Mongolia rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 51.9% against 51.3% in Brazil, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 8th and Mongolia ranks 6th of 31 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.6% | 35.4% | 11.2% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 51.1% | 39.1% | 12.0% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 51.9% | 1.0% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Brazil or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 51.9% against 51.3% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 0.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Brazil ranks 8th and Mongolia ranks 6th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group