Belarus vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Belarus
77.5%
in 2019
Mongolia
51.9%
in 2020
Belarus rank
3rd
Mongolia rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural over time
- Belarus
- Mongolia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 77.5% against 51.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 25.6%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.5 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 3rd and Mongolia ranks 6th of 30 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.6% | 35.4% | 32.2% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 71.6% | 38.4% | 33.2% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural, Belarus or Mongolia?
- Belarus, at 77.5% against 51.9% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural between Belarus and Mongolia?
- 25.6%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - contributory pensions -rural?
- Belarus ranks 3rd and Mongolia ranks 6th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group