Kyrgyzstan vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Kyrgyzstan
61.9%
in 2020
Viet Nam
73.7%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Viet Nam rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 73.7% against 61.9% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 11.8%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.9% | 15.4% | 16.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 61.2% | 48.1% | 13.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 61.9% | 73.7% | 11.8% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 73.7% against 61.9% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 11.8%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group