Armenia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Armenia
52.2%
in 2022
South Africa
43.4%
in 2021
Armenia rank
5th
South Africa rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural over time
- Armenia
- South Africa
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 52.2% against 43.4% in South Africa, a difference of 8.8%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 8th of 35 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 56.0% | 44.2% | 11.8% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 51.2% | 42.5% | 8.7% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural, Armenia or South Africa?
- Armenia, at 52.2% against 43.4% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural between Armenia and South Africa?
- 8.8%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Armenia ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 8th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group