Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Ecuador
35.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
37.8%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
22nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 37.8% against 35.5% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 22nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 36.6% | 38.3% | 1.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 11.2% | 37.8% | 26.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 37.8% against 35.5% in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Ecuador ranks 22nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group