Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Costa Rica
42.7%
in 2022
Mongolia
45.9%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
10th
Mongolia rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 45.9% against 42.7% in Costa Rica, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 8th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.1% | 27.4% | 6.8% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 44.8% | 45.9% | 1.1% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 45.9% against 42.7% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 3.2%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Costa Rica ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 8th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group