Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Brazil
38.8%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
37.8%
in 2020
Brazil rank
17th
Kyrgyzstan rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 38.8% against 37.8% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.8% | 23.2% | 20.6% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 41.3% | 38.1% | 3.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 41.3% | 37.8% | 3.5% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Brazil, at 38.8% against 37.8% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.0%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Brazil ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group