Belarus vs Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Belarus
44.5%
in 2019
Moldova
42.4%
in 2018
Belarus rank
9th
Moldova rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Belarus
- Moldova
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 44.5% against 42.4% in Moldova, a difference of 2.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 9th and Moldova ranks 11th of 34 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Belarus or Moldova?
- Belarus, at 44.5% against 42.4% in Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Belarus and Moldova?
- 2.1%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Moldova rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Belarus ranks 9th and Moldova ranks 11th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group