Serbia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Serbia
54.1%
in 2022
Uruguay
55.4%
in 2022
Serbia rank
5th
Uruguay rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Serbia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 55.4% against 54.1% in Serbia, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 5th and Uruguay ranks 4th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 53.9% | 53.2% | 0.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 49.8% | 54.8% | 4.9% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Serbia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 55.4% against 54.1% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Serbia and Uruguay?
- 1.3%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Serbia ranks 5th and Uruguay ranks 4th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group