Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Costa Rica
42.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
43.6%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
11th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 43.6% against 42.6% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 35.7% | 40.9% | 5.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 45.5% | 43.6% | 2.0% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 43.6% against 42.6% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Costa Rica ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group