Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Belarus
41.1%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
43.6%
in 2020
Belarus rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 43.6% against 41.1% in Belarus, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Belarus ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 43.6% against 41.1% in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Belarus ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group