Belarus vs Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Belarus
41.1%
in 2019
Costa Rica
42.6%
in 2022
Belarus rank
13th
Costa Rica rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Belarus
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 42.6% against 41.1% in Belarus, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Belarus ranks 13th and Costa Rica ranks 11th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.9% | 42.8% | 6.9% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 37.7% | 36.1% | 1.6% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Belarus or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 42.6% against 41.1% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 1.5%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Belarus ranks 13th and Costa Rica ranks 11th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group