Peru vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Peru
31.2%
in 2022
Serbia
33.0%
in 2022
Peru rank
23rd
Serbia rank
22nd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 33.0% against 31.2% in Peru, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Peru ranks 23rd and Serbia ranks 22nd of 31 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 29.6% | 42.0% | 12.3% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 31.4% | 31.8% | 0.4% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Peru or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 33.0% against 31.2% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Peru and Serbia?
- 1.8%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Peru ranks 23rd and Serbia ranks 22nd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group