Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Mongolia
44.1%
in 2020
Uruguay
45.6%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
10th
Uruguay rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 45.6% against 44.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 10th and Uruguay ranks 9th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.5% | 25.2% | 1.3% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 28.2% | 29.5% | 1.3% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 44.1% | 46.4% | 2.3% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 45.6% against 44.1% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 1.5%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Mongolia ranks 10th and Uruguay ranks 9th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group